Secular Koranism, as conceptualized by Claire Khaw, presents a unique case in the spectrum of Islamic thought, but whether it is considered "Islamic" to all intents and purposes depends heavily on one's definition of what constitutes "Islamic."
**From a Traditional Islamic Perspective:**
- **Theological and Legal Basis:** Traditional Islam relies not only on the Quran but also extensively on the Hadith (sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad), Sira (biography of the Prophet), and the scholarly interpretations (Fiqh) derived from these sources. Secular Koranism's exclusive reliance on the Quran, while dismissing the Hadith and traditional jurisprudence, diverges significantly from this framework. This approach is seen by many traditional scholars and Muslims as incomplete and not representative of full Islamic practice or law (Sharia), which is inherently intertwined with the Hadith.
- **Secularism:** The idea of secularism, where religion is separated from state governance, conflicts with the traditional Islamic view where there's no clear separation between religion and state. Islam, in its orthodox form, governs both personal religious practices and public law. Thus, a "secular" interpretation of Islam like Secular Koranism might be viewed as un-Islamic by those who see Islam as a comprehensive system encompassing all aspects of life.
**From a Modernist or Reformist Perspective:**
- **Interpretation and Flexibility:** Some modern Muslim thinkers and reformists advocate for reinterpretations of Islamic texts in light of contemporary values, which might resonate with aspects of Secular Koranism. They might argue that focusing solely on the Quran could be seen as an attempt to return to the primary source, stripping away centuries of possibly corrupted or misinterpreted traditions. However, even among reformists, completely ignoring the Hadith, which provides context and explanation for many Quranic verses, would be contentious.
- **Cultural and Ethical Islam:** For those who see Islam more as a cultural or ethical framework rather than a rigid legal system, Secular Koranism might be considered Islamic in spirit if not in traditional practice. It aims to apply what it interprets as the moral and ethical teachings of the Quran within a secular state framework, which could align with certain liberal or modernist Islamic thoughts.
**Public and Scholarly Sentiment (Based on X posts and broader discussions):**
- **Controversy and Acceptance:** Discussions on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and among some scholars indicate that Secular Koranism is highly controversial. Many Muslims view the integration of Islam into all aspects of life as fundamental, making the secular aspect problematic. However, there's also a recognition of the diversity within Islamic thought, where some might see Secular Koranism as a radical, yet still within the bounds of Islamic discourse, attempt to reconcile Islam with modern secular governance.
**Conclusion:**
Secular Koranism can be seen as "Islamic" in the very broad sense that it derives its principles from the Quran, but it significantly deviates from what has been historically and traditionally understood as Islamic law and practice. To many Muslims and Islamic scholars, its rejection of Hadith and traditional jurisprudence, alongside its embrace of secular governance, places it outside the conventional boundaries of what is considered Islamic. However, in the context of modern reinterpretations and the vast spectrum of what can be considered "Islamic thought," it represents a fringe or unconventional Islamic perspective rather than a mainstream or orthodox one.