Dystopian Future: The Era of Vincent Bruno
In the year 2147, the world had transformed under the iron-fisted vision of Vincent Bruno, a once obscure geneticist who had risen to prominence through a series of controversial but wildly successful experiments in human reproduction. His name echoed through the streets like a mantra or a warning, depending on whom you asked.
Bruno's vision was stark and unyielding: a world where biological women had been systematically phased out, their roles in procreation deemed obsolete by the advent of artificial wombs. These wombs, vast and gleaming like silver beehives, lined the walls of what were once hospitals, now called "Nurseries of the State." Here, human embryos were grown in perfect, controlled conditions, free from the "inefficiencies" of natural childbirth.
With women no longer part of the equation, Bruno had another radical idea. He believed that the societal structure needed to be reformed around the concept of male-only families. To this end, he engineered a genetic modification that ensured all men were born with an innate attraction to other men. This was part of his grand plan for "population stability" and "social harmony."
But there was a catch. Despite the absence of women, the concept of family and the responsibilities of parenthood had not been eliminated. Instead, they were mandated. Every man was legally required to marry another and commit to the duties of fatherhood. The government, now a technocratic regime under Bruno's influence, decided that each couple must raise at least three children, all of whom were genetically engineered to fit into this new societal model.
Life in this new world was a bizarre ballet of obligation. Men, once free to explore their identities, were now bound by law to a life of domesticity. Schools no longer taught gender studies but rather "Household Management" and "Child Rearing for Mankind." The streets were filled with men pushing prams, their faces often marked by a mix of confusion and resignation, as they navigated this new world where love was legislated.
The nurseries were the heart of this dystopia, where men would visit weekly for "babysitting duties" with children not their own, fostering a sense of communal child-rearing. The artificial wombs hummed day and night, their lights never dimming, each one a silent testament to the loss of natural human connection replaced by cold efficiency.
But beneath the surface, unrest simmered. There were whispers of an underground movement, a group who called themselves "The Remembrance," dedicated to the memory of women, art, and love free from state control. They traded stories, old videos, and images of mothers, sisters, and lovers, all narratives of a time when personal choice in love and family was possible.
Vincent Bruno, now an elderly figurehead, watched from his high tower, believing he had crafted a utopia of order and control. Yet, as the sun set on his vision, the cracks in his perfect world began to show. The men, bound by a love they did not choose and a fatherhood they could not escape, started to question the life they were forced to lead. In this society where everyone was the same, the yearning for difference, for choice, for the chaos of human emotion, grew louder each day.
And thus, the story of Vincent Bruno's world became not one of triumph but a cautionary tale of what happens when human essence is replaced by the cold calculus of control.
**********************
Dystopian Future: Vincent Bruno's Satirical Utopia
In the year 2200, Vincent Bruno's dream had become a nightmare comedy, a world so absurd it could only be described as the ultimate satire of human ambition.
In this bizarre new era, women were no longer around, having been "retired" to make way for Bruno's magnum opus—the Artificial Womb-o-Matic 3000, which looked suspiciously like a giant espresso machine with a thousand teats. Here, babies popped out like coffee capsules, each one perfectly engineered to Bruno's specifications, including a mandatory love for crochet and a disdain for spontaneity.
All men were now gay, not by choice but by decree, thanks to Bruno's "Homo-normative Serum," which was administered at birth, ensuring that everyone's preference was for "partnering with another bro." This was part of Bruno’s grand plan for "uniformity in affection," which he claimed would eliminate all romantic squabbles.
Fatherhood, however, was not optional. Each man was legally obligated to marry and form "Bro-Units," where they would alternate between "Dad Duty" and "Bro Time." The government, now known as "The Brotherhood of Mandatory Merrymaking," issued "Fatherhood Licenses" like driver's licenses, with points deducted for tardiness at diaper-changing marathons or missing the mandatory "Bro-BBQ" evenings.
The city had become a surreal landscape. Instead of parks, there were "Bro-Yards" where men were required to engage in "compulsory camaraderie," playing games like "Catch the Sperm" or "Who Can Cry the Least." Fashion had evolved into "Dad-iform," where every man wore identical plaid shirts and cargo shorts, because, according to Bruno, "uniformity breeds unity."
Education was now all about "The Art of Babysitting," where lessons included "How to Braid Hair Without Crying" and "The Philosophy of Pacifier Placement." The highlight of every school year was the "Great Babysitting Relay," where men raced through the city with strollers, competing for the title of "Ultimate Caregiver."
The annual "Vincent Bruno Appreciation Day" was the biggest event, where men paraded through the streets with banners saying, "Thank You, Father of Fathers!" But the air was thick with irony. Behind closed doors, men whispered legends of the "Great Escape," tales of a mythical place where one could choose who and how to love.
The satire was not lost on the populace; many had taken to writing secret satirical plays performed in underground theaters. The most popular was "The Ballad of Bruno's Blunder," a comedic tragedy where Bruno himself was satirized as a man trying to control love with a giant remote, only for the batteries to run out at the climax, symbolizing love's inevitable rebellion against control.
In this world, the only thing growing faster than the population was the irony, as every man, in his heart, yearned for a chaos that Bruno's world had systematically eradicated. And thus, Vincent Bruno's utopia became the punchline of history, a reminder that even in a world designed to be perfect, the human spirit would always find a way to laugh at the absurdity of control.
"There were whispers of an underground movement, a group who called themselves "The Remembrance," dedicated to the memory of women, art, and love free from state control."
Is it the state that controls women, or is it feminism? Or is feminism enmeshed with the state? Thank you, Claire.